Top 7 myths about wedding photography

“Today I’ve been blessed to photograph weddings for 24 years.
Wherever you are, I will come and create photographs that make you feel good about your life and the people in it.”


1. A family member/friend can take all the pictures we need.

This is possibly the biggest bit of misinformation in the wedding business. Many brides make this mistake each year and one only has to do a quick search on any of the bridal chat boards to see how devastating this mistake truly can be. The experience of an accomplished wedding professional is simply too important. He/she will know what’s about to happen. They will know whats going to go wrong often before it even happens and can adjust for difficult lighting situations. He has the backup equipment to ensure your day is captured in all its glory. Most brides comment after their wedding that the best money they spent on their wedding was their photographer.

2. Photographers have it easy since they only work 8hrs a week.

Boy do we wish!! In actuality the number of man hours it takes from start to finish with each bride is really between 30-40 hrs. Nobody remembers the 2-3 hrs spent in consultations, meetings, answering phone calls etc, then there is the 8+ hrs on the wedding itself, 12-18 more hours of post production time, another 1-2 on print production, dvd slideshows, archiving files etc, 10-12 for custom album design. The time racks up pretty quickly.

3. You need to give your photographer a shot list.

This one comes from all those bridal magazines mostly. Unfortunately these lists typically are not written by real world wedding photographers. Ask yourself this question: Would I rather have my photographer covering the action, or reading a list? We generally don’t know who the people on the list are. Most of the suggestions on the lists are shots that will be taken by any experienced wedding photographer anyway. Example Bride with her Father (really??) The Cake (really??) Many more are simply superfluous groupings only listed to make the list look good. In reality, if you must have a list, the best way to utilize it is to simply give it to a family member or bridesmaid who actually knows the people on the list, and make them responsible for gathering them up. Not only will this save some time for you but this also will free your professional up to create the kind of images that attracted you to me in the first place.

4. Table shots.

Sounds great right? But the reality of it is this: The only time when everyone is at the table is during dinner. The images really aren’t typically chosen to be part of the brides album. The guests normally aren’t going to want them unless the bride and groom are in the photo with them, so really you need to go to each table with us to make the images mean anything. Now when we get there, they are all going to want to talk a little, and in order to see everyone, half the table will need to go stand on the opposite side; so you are going to average 3-5 minutes per table to get it set up. Now say you have an average crowd of 150 people. Tables are normally 8 each. That’s 19 tables at 5 minutes each which is an1-1.5hrs of your reception devoted to taking image of folks gathered around a cluttered table. Kind of a long way to go for shots like this. A much better idea here is the disposable cameras. They are perfect for these “grab and grins”, and free your professional up to do his job and capture the images that made you hire him in the first place.

5. Our Job is easy now that its digital.

I love this one. In some ways sure its easier. In a lot more ways its much more difficult. Heres why: When shooting film, the typical wedding took about 200 images. Now that has swelled to often more than 1000. When shooting film, the film process held about a 5 stop exposure latitude, which means that as long as you were in that safe zone, the lab could make a decent print. With digital we have about 1.5 stops. No problem if you know what you are doing, but sadly many struggle with this every week. Uncle bob that happens to have a digital camera won’t stand a chance here. When shooting film, we simply dropped our rolls off at the lab, and returned a few days later to pick up the prints. The “lab guy” did all the work and made us look good. Now with digital, we are the “lab guy” and often spend countless hours in post production doing what the “lab guy” used to do. Also, top of the line 35mm film cameras used to top out at around 1700 bucks and would pretty much last for 15 years or more. Top quality digital slr’s from those same companies are now often 5-8K each, and seemingly become “antiques” about every 2-4 years as technology increases.

6. Its best to find a company that does both Video and Photography .

We dont hear this as much as we used too now that video has faded from popularity somewhat. (20% of weddings according to a national study). But it is an interesting one. Heres why this isnt such a good idea as it may seem. Sure its easy to write one check. But…..most photographers and most videographers are good at doing one or the other. The methods of capture are completely different. Very few are actually good at both. The old saying “Jack of all trades; master at none” rings true here as well. There are even companies that suggest they can do it all…Limo, video, photo, dj, invitations, etc. Fact is, they simply are ok at each of them. If they were really that great at any one, they wouldn’t need to be doing all the others. The best practitioners in any field are called specialists. Isn’t that what you want for each vendor? Someone who specialized in just that field? You wouldn’t have a podiatrist do your eye exam would you? Or have a civil lawyer defend you if you got arrested? Of course not, you would want someone who specialized in exactly what you need. If you want a videographer, fine, find a good one; but be wary of the guys trying to sell you a package deal.

7. Photography is overpriced

This is one again that we hear lots of discussion about. It seems like a logical statement, as good photography is not cheap. Actually considering that the resulting images become some of your most treasured keepsakes, its actually priceless. Similarly, the regret faced by those whose job botched, makes what we charge seem like a pittance. Remember, the average wedding professional will spend 30-40 hrs on you and your job. Similarly, the national average net “salary” for wedding photographers in the USA is 28K per year. Why? Because of all the expenses, overhead, and the limited number of events we can work in any given year.